Topics started by mgaritta

9 Topics

M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Kinetic & Epicor ERP

UBAQ REST Call from JitterBit Error 400

I am using JitterBit to do a “PUT BAQ(UBAQ)”.  This is a native endpoint call they provide.  It is the only option for a UBAQ that they offer.  Prior to doing anything in JitterBit I used the Epicor swagger pages to test the UBAQ  here   /EPICORERP/api/help/v1/baq//RFID-UD24(CD)/index#!/OData/update.  I noticed they only have a PATCH but I was under the impression that the JitterBit “POST” would be similar?  In any case, may goal was to call the UBAQ. In Epicor it was configured to only return records in UD24 where Date01 IS NULL.  I set it to only allow updates to the Date01 field as well.  So the user/JitterBit would call the BAQ and provide a list of values that are stored in Key1 .  If there is a Match then update the Date01 filed which is also provided in the request.  This seems to work in the Epicor Swagger.  They provided the input and I filled in as needed and ran it.  The Date01 was updated as expected.  However I did notice that it “ADDED” records that it didn’t find a match

0
M
1 month ago
M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Kinetic & Epicor ERP

BOM Categories

Does Epicor acknowledge/support  BOM categories similar to that of SAP? Aside from s standard BOM does Epicor use Costing BOMs or Production BOMs for example? After creating a Standard BOM for a given part you would have the ability to replicate that BOM for costing/production purposes? 

1
W
5 months ago
M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Kinetic & Epicor ERP

Planning Throughput Report?

For a given manufactured part is there a report that will calculate delivery date based on lead-times for build, test, pack, and purchased components ect? They basically are looking for a BOM/TimePhase/MulitLvL Pegging style report that given a Part and a Start Date it will drill down into all aspects of “creating” it up to and through shipping it out.

3
M
1 year ago
M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Kinetic & Epicor ERP

Syteline Infor CloudSuite Industrial (CSI) to Epicor 10 Migration

We are looking to migrate a company currently using Syteline Infor CloudSuite Industrial (CSI) into our on-prem Epicor 10.2.500.  Has anyone gone through a similar Syteline-Epicor migration?  Any feedback/advice would be appreciated.

1
J
1 year ago
M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Americas - Northeast - CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT

PartAlloc QTY Transitions

I am trying to create an In-Tran Data Directive that will put a hard stop on users over Fulfilling orders. I’m trying to prevent an over shipment further upstream (we had several and it’s an issue with firearms). I created a BAQ that is being called VIA Custom Code (DD/In-Tran/SYNC/Terminate on Error) that basically provides summed totals of what was already shipped, currently “Reserved/Allocated/Picking/Packed” and what the Order/Line requires. My issue appears to be the way Epicor Updates the PartAlloc table. In short, I am summing up what they are doing in the current transaction and adding that to what was already shipped as well as what is in (Reserved/Allocated/Picking/Picked) and comparing quantities to Order Line total. If the quantity exceeds the line total it stops the transaction.For starters if the current transaction is an Update I stop it if there is more than 1 row in PartAlloc for the order/line( a saw a few in there). If the transaction if Adding a Row I just sum Shipp

0
M
1 year ago
M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Americas - Northeast - CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT

Custom Segregated Demand

I maybe incorrect in my interpretations of how Epicor will handle these, so please correct me where needed.We control what we are manufacturing by restricting MRP to use a manually loaded MPS.  All Sales Orders are Unfirmed when they are entered. When the orders are allocated in Fulfillment Workbench I believe they get firmed before they are packed and shipped (as Epicor requires it ).We have some orders that are for “Samples”.  These samples may be identical or contain identical subcomponents that go into parts loaded into MPS.  However there may also be some very unique components that are not contained in any of the manually loaded MPS as well.The individuals involved with these “Samples” wish to drive their own demand, order their own parts and generate their own jobs without affecting what MPS is demanding. They also do not what their materials/parts to be seen or used outside of their Samples orders.My initial thought was to allow users to flag Sample orders with a reservation pr

0
M
1 year ago
M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Kinetic & Epicor ERP

RMA: INS-STK Post to 3 GL Accounts (COS Labor, COS Material, COS Overhead)?

When we receive a RMA and dispose it to stock it creates the INS-STK transactions and Debits/Credits the  the following GL accounts based on out system configuration as it applies to  the Inventory Transaction Hierarchy.Credit: Cost of Returns account from Company's Inventory COS and WIP GL controlDebit:  Inventory account from Part Class Gl control I was asked whether or not we can have a RMA INS-STK transaction go into 3 different GL accounts?  So rather then hit the 1 account (Cost of Returns account from Company's Inventory COS and WIP ) it breaks up the posted value into COS Labor, COS Material, COS Overhead.  (Each being a different Chart of Accounts).  Apparently this is similar to how Epicor works doing a sale? (There are 3 similar accounts where the Labor/Material/Overhead is  posted to).  They also want to to make sure that the value which is applied to these accounts reflects the historical cost that  went out for not the current cost.I’m pretty sure this involves posting ru

6
T
1 year ago
M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Kinetic & Epicor ERP

QA PO Approvals

Does Epicor natively support the ability to route POs in the approval process to Quality for  their approval?  I thought I could add a flag to the PO headers which when checked would route the POs for an initial Quality approvals before they can be “purchased”.  In order to use this field I would have to add QA people as Buyers and then only allow POs with the QA flag set to be “Approved” by QA people.  The issue I see with this is these QA people are basically just buyers at this point.  The other issue is I think they would have to be at every approval level.  So in our case 5k, 10k 50k and so forth (I don't think a 50k PO will stop at the 5K and 10k levels for approvals there.)  I would hate to add a bunch of code if Epicor supports what I am tiring to accomplish….  

4
R
2 years ago
M
mgarittaKnown Participant
asked in Americas - Northeast - CT, MA, ME, NH, RI, VT

Limited UAT 10.2.500.19 TO 10.2.700.9

We have a need to expedite an update of Epicor from 10.2.500.19 to 10.2.700.9.  I reviewed the Release Guides and Feature Highlights for .600 and .700.  Other than some of the financial updates in .600 I didn't see much else that was applicable.  Our Finance group is the one pushing this update  to implement DocStar AP Automation.  Consequently, they are ready, willing & able to test the release.  The other departments however are not as eager or “available”.  So my question is, can we perform this update with little UAT? We are a little heavy on the customizations (Service Connect, C#, Linq, Handhelds, APM etc). I spun up a new app server with 10.2.700.9.  I tested the integrations of service connect and the reports and everything seems to be running as expected.

1
T
3 years ago
Terms & Conditions