May I ask who in our group is either live on Epicor ERP 10.x or actively engaged in implementing it or upgrading to it?
Regards,
Scott
Epicor ERP 10.x
Userlevel 4
We are live on the most current version 10.1.400.10
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Scott Lepley
wrote:
> May I ask who in our group is either live on Epicor ERP 10.x or actively
> engaged in implementing it or upgrading to it?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Scott Lepley
wrote:
> May I ask who in our group is either live on Epicor ERP 10.x or actively
> engaged in implementing it or upgrading to it?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
A
We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on 4/11/16
Michael Hornberger
[Premier Store Fixtures]http://www.premierfixtures.com
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: Scott Lepley [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:55 PM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - Epicor ERP 10.x
May I ask who in our group is either live on Epicor ERP 10.x or actively engaged in implementing it or upgrading to it?
Regards,
Scott
Michael Hornberger
[Premier Store Fixtures]http://www.premierfixtures.com
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: Scott Lepley [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:55 PM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - Epicor ERP 10.x
May I ask who in our group is either live on Epicor ERP 10.x or actively engaged in implementing it or upgrading to it?
Regards,
Scott
Userlevel 4
Good morning Marvin and Michael,
Thank you for your replies!
Here at FSIP, we have had several extended discussions with Epicor and our systems supplier about the appropriate system architecture for our implementation of Epicor ERP 10.1.400.xx. We have received conflicting "guidance" regarding the appropriate use, mix and sizing of SSD's, 15k HD's and 10k HD's, the appropriate configuration of this storage as RAID 5 and RAID 10 for different purposes, and the appropriate VMWare configuration for performance and disaster recovery. Would either or both of you be willing to share what system architecture you have implemented and, with hindsight, what you think you may have done differently?
Regards,
Scott Lepley
Analyst
Flight Systems Industrial Products
1015 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
717-254-3747
800-333-1194
Visit our website and online catalog www.fsip.bizhttp://www.fsip.biz
From: Michael Hornberger [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:11 PM
To: 'cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org'
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on 4/11/16
Michael Hornberger
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
________________________________
From: Marvin Horst [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:09 PM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We are live on the most current version 10.1.400.10
________________________________
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Scott Lepleymailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org>> wrote:
From: Scott Lepley [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:55 PM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org<mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org>
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - Epicor ERP 10.x
May I ask who in our group is either live on Epicor ERP 10.x or actively engaged in implementing it or upgrading to it?
Regards,
Scott
Thank you for your replies!
Here at FSIP, we have had several extended discussions with Epicor and our systems supplier about the appropriate system architecture for our implementation of Epicor ERP 10.1.400.xx. We have received conflicting "guidance" regarding the appropriate use, mix and sizing of SSD's, 15k HD's and 10k HD's, the appropriate configuration of this storage as RAID 5 and RAID 10 for different purposes, and the appropriate VMWare configuration for performance and disaster recovery. Would either or both of you be willing to share what system architecture you have implemented and, with hindsight, what you think you may have done differently?
Regards,
Scott Lepley
Analyst
Flight Systems Industrial Products
1015 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
717-254-3747
800-333-1194
Visit our website and online catalog www.fsip.bizhttp://www.fsip.biz
From: Michael Hornberger [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:11 PM
To: 'cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org'
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on 4/11/16
Michael Hornberger
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
________________________________
From: Marvin Horst [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:09 PM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We are live on the most current version 10.1.400.10
________________________________
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Scott Lepley
From: Scott Lepley [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:55 PM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org<mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org>
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - Epicor ERP 10.x
May I ask who in our group is either live on Epicor ERP 10.x or actively engaged in implementing it or upgrading to it?
Regards,
Scott
A
Up time and demand is huge for our company. Our server is housed in a data center and currently we have 5 separate locations accessing the server. As a result we must use terminal servers to parse the load of users. We cannot run the client locally from the sites as it requires far too much band width. That being said, we process very large amounts of transactions. We have a single Fusion-IO drive in the server. Before I came to this company, they found a standard RAID with spindle drives was not able to process fast enough. While on Epicor 9, they had SQL back end, but the Progress interface was always causing problems under heavy load. They had Fusion-IO then as well. The single best improvement for performance is eliminating the Progress! We have not entered our peak load season yet, be we still process high volumes of transactions and this server performs great. The cost was easily offset by the performance of the Fusion-IO drive. I run DMT loads almost exactly 10x faster in E10.
Michael Hornberger
[Premier Store Fixtures]http://www.premierfixtures.com
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: Scott Lepley [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:41 AM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
Good morning Marvin and Michael,
Thank you for your replies!
Here at FSIP, we have had several extended discussions with Epicor and our systems supplier about the appropriate system architecture for our implementation of Epicor ERP 10.1.400.xx. We have received conflicting "guidance" regarding the appropriate use, mix and sizing of SSD's, 15k HD's and 10k HD's, the appropriate configuration of this storage as RAID 5 and RAID 10 for different purposes, and the appropriate VMWare configuration for performance and disaster recovery. Would either or both of you be willing to share what system architecture you have implemented and, with hindsight, what you think you may have done differently?
Regards,
Scott Lepley
Analyst
Flight Systems Industrial Products
1015 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
717-254-3747
800-333-1194
Visit our website and online catalog www.fsip.bizhttp://www.fsip.biz
From: Michael Hornberger [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:11 PM
To: 'cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org'mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org>>
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on 4/11/16
Michael Hornberger
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
Michael Hornberger
[Premier Store Fixtures]http://www.premierfixtures.com
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
From: Scott Lepley [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 8:41 AM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
Good morning Marvin and Michael,
Thank you for your replies!
Here at FSIP, we have had several extended discussions with Epicor and our systems supplier about the appropriate system architecture for our implementation of Epicor ERP 10.1.400.xx. We have received conflicting "guidance" regarding the appropriate use, mix and sizing of SSD's, 15k HD's and 10k HD's, the appropriate configuration of this storage as RAID 5 and RAID 10 for different purposes, and the appropriate VMWare configuration for performance and disaster recovery. Would either or both of you be willing to share what system architecture you have implemented and, with hindsight, what you think you may have done differently?
Regards,
Scott Lepley
Analyst
Flight Systems Industrial Products
1015 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
717-254-3747
800-333-1194
Visit our website and online catalog www.fsip.bizhttp://www.fsip.biz
From: Michael Hornberger [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:11 PM
To: 'cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org'
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on 4/11/16
Michael Hornberger
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
We have a small user base of 32 licensed users. Currently sql server and
the app server are running on the same VM. Plans are in place to move the
app server to a separate VM. We are using 15K SCSI drive in a RAID 10
configuration. I would not recommend RAID 5 it's only benefit is increased
storage capacity, but suffers from slower write speed. SSD's are general
faster than 15K drives if you are willing to spend more, and the Fusion-io
drives (SSD on PCI), that Michael's using, are even faster and more
expensive.
Our VM has enough memory for the SQL Server 2012 process to use it's max
capacity of 64GB. Epicor 10 is supposed to be supported on SQL Server 2014,
but I'm not sure if Epicor can use the new in-memory OLTP features. Seems
like the future growth in performance will be in-memory databases.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Scott Lepley
wrote:
> Good morning Marvin and Michael,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your replies!
>
>
>
> Here at FSIP, we have had several extended discussions with Epicor and our
> systems supplier about the appropriate system architecture for our
> implementation of Epicor ERP 10.1.400.xx. We have received conflicting
> “guidance” regarding the appropriate use, mix and sizing of SSD’s, 15k HD’s
> and 10k HD’s, the appropriate configuration of this storage as RAID 5 and
> RAID 10 for different purposes, and the appropriate VMWare configuration
> for performance and disaster recovery. Would either or both of you be
> willing to share what system architecture you have implemented and, with
> hindsight, what you think you may have done differently?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott Lepley
>
>
>
> Analyst
>
> Flight Systems Industrial Products
>
> 1015 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
>
> 717-254-3747
>
> 800-333-1194
> Visit our website and online catalog www.fsip.biz
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Hornberger [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:11 PM
> *To:* 'cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org'
> *Subject:* [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
>
>
>
> We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on
> 4/11/16
>
>
>
> Michael Hornberger
>
> Epicor Systems Manager
>
> 4650 Oakleys Ln
>
> Henrico, VA 23231
> Direct: 804-525-2442
> Cell: 540-421-2292
> Fax: 804-525-0300
>
>
>
the app server are running on the same VM. Plans are in place to move the
app server to a separate VM. We are using 15K SCSI drive in a RAID 10
configuration. I would not recommend RAID 5 it's only benefit is increased
storage capacity, but suffers from slower write speed. SSD's are general
faster than 15K drives if you are willing to spend more, and the Fusion-io
drives (SSD on PCI), that Michael's using, are even faster and more
expensive.
Our VM has enough memory for the SQL Server 2012 process to use it's max
capacity of 64GB. Epicor 10 is supposed to be supported on SQL Server 2014,
but I'm not sure if Epicor can use the new in-memory OLTP features. Seems
like the future growth in performance will be in-memory databases.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Scott Lepley
wrote:
> Good morning Marvin and Michael,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your replies!
>
>
>
> Here at FSIP, we have had several extended discussions with Epicor and our
> systems supplier about the appropriate system architecture for our
> implementation of Epicor ERP 10.1.400.xx. We have received conflicting
> “guidance” regarding the appropriate use, mix and sizing of SSD’s, 15k HD’s
> and 10k HD’s, the appropriate configuration of this storage as RAID 5 and
> RAID 10 for different purposes, and the appropriate VMWare configuration
> for performance and disaster recovery. Would either or both of you be
> willing to share what system architecture you have implemented and, with
> hindsight, what you think you may have done differently?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott Lepley
>
>
>
> Analyst
>
> Flight Systems Industrial Products
>
> 1015 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
>
> 717-254-3747
>
> 800-333-1194
> Visit our website and online catalog www.fsip.biz
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Hornberger [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:11 PM
> *To:* 'cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org'
> *Subject:* [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
>
>
>
> We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on
> 4/11/16
>
>
>
> Michael Hornberger
>
> Epicor Systems Manager
>
> 4650 Oakleys Ln
>
> Henrico, VA 23231
> Direct: 804-525-2442
> Cell: 540-421-2292
> Fax: 804-525-0300
>
>
>
Never use RAID 5 for a database! Way to easily corrupted and much too slow on writes!
Mercer
From: Marvin Horst [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:58 AM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We have a small user base of 32 licensed users. Currently sql server and the app server are running on the same VM. Plans are in place to move the app server to a separate VM. We are using 15K SCSI drive in a RAID 10 configuration. I would not recommend RAID 5 it's only benefit is increased storage capacity, but suffers from slower write speed. SSD's are general faster than 15K drives if you are willing to spend more, and the Fusion-io drives (SSD on PCI), that Michael's using, are even faster and more expensive.
Our VM has enough memory for the SQL Server 2012 process to use it's max capacity of 64GB. Epicor 10 is supposed to be supported on SQL Server 2014, but I'm not sure if Epicor can use the new in-memory OLTP features. Seems like the future growth in performance will be in-memory databases.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Scott Lepleymailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org>> wrote:
Good morning Marvin and Michael,
Thank you for your replies!
Here at FSIP, we have had several extended discussions with Epicor and our systems supplier about the appropriate system architecture for our implementation of Epicor ERP 10.1.400.xx. We have received conflicting “guidance” regarding the appropriate use, mix and sizing of SSD’s, 15k HD’s and 10k HD’s, the appropriate configuration of this storage as RAID 5 and RAID 10 for different purposes, and the appropriate VMWare configuration for performance and disaster recovery. Would either or both of you be willing to share what system architecture you have implemented and, with hindsight, what you think you may have done differently?
Regards,
Scott Lepley
Analyst
Flight Systems Industrial Products
1015 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
717-254-3747
800-333-1194
Visit our website and online catalog www.fsip.bizhttp://www.fsip.biz
From: Michael Hornberger [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:11 PM
To: 'cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org<mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org>'mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org>>
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on 4/11/16
Michael Hornberger
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
Mercer
From: Marvin Horst [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 9:58 AM
To: cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We have a small user base of 32 licensed users. Currently sql server and the app server are running on the same VM. Plans are in place to move the app server to a separate VM. We are using 15K SCSI drive in a RAID 10 configuration. I would not recommend RAID 5 it's only benefit is increased storage capacity, but suffers from slower write speed. SSD's are general faster than 15K drives if you are willing to spend more, and the Fusion-io drives (SSD on PCI), that Michael's using, are even faster and more expensive.
Our VM has enough memory for the SQL Server 2012 process to use it's max capacity of 64GB. Epicor 10 is supposed to be supported on SQL Server 2014, but I'm not sure if Epicor can use the new in-memory OLTP features. Seems like the future growth in performance will be in-memory databases.
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Scott Lepley
Good morning Marvin and Michael,
Thank you for your replies!
Here at FSIP, we have had several extended discussions with Epicor and our systems supplier about the appropriate system architecture for our implementation of Epicor ERP 10.1.400.xx. We have received conflicting “guidance” regarding the appropriate use, mix and sizing of SSD’s, 15k HD’s and 10k HD’s, the appropriate configuration of this storage as RAID 5 and RAID 10 for different purposes, and the appropriate VMWare configuration for performance and disaster recovery. Would either or both of you be willing to share what system architecture you have implemented and, with hindsight, what you think you may have done differently?
Regards,
Scott Lepley
Analyst
Flight Systems Industrial Products
1015 Harrisburg Pike, Carlisle, PA 17013
717-254-3747
800-333-1194
Visit our website and online catalog www.fsip.bizhttp://www.fsip.biz
From: Michael Hornberger [mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 4:11 PM
To: 'cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org<mailto:cpaeug@list.epicorusers.org>'
Subject: [EUG_CPAEUG] - RE: Epicor ERP 10.x
We have just gone through the upgrade from 9.05 to 10.1.400.11 Live on 4/11/16
Michael Hornberger
Epicor Systems Manager
4650 Oakleys Ln
Henrico, VA 23231
Direct: 804-525-2442
Cell: 540-421-2292
Fax: 804-525-0300
Reply
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.