“Inventory Transfer” is for bin to bin or warehouse to warehouse within in the same Site. It is not for Site to Site. You should reverse what you did with DMT. then you have three options to make the transfer: set up a “shared warehouse,” this would make it so “inventory Transfer” would work... create a Transfer Order then pack and ship the transfer order. This is what the ware house team should be doing manually if you don’t have “shared warehouse” set up just do a pair of quantity adjustments with an appropriate reason code. I would do #3, it’s the easiest.
What is HCM?
I was pulling my hair out with this last month. We are working on a BPM to prevent Customer service from entering a sales order with a part that is not in the Part master table. Another thing I have considered is to make a new “default” UOM class that contains all UOMs. These part on the fly orders use whatever your default UOM class happens to be. If we were to do that then I would also have to police the fake default UOM class to make sure that it isn't’ used on a real part master record.
the ICPO process is very finicky. the PO is the start of it all and it must be perfect. to change anything you have to back all the way up to that PO. If there is an “incoming suggestion” in the selling company then that suggestion needs to be rejected. That will create a Change PO suggestion in the Buying company. that Change PO suggestion needs to be processed or deleted. Then you can un-approve the PO and make a change. sometimes it is still blocked, in that case you need a data fix from Epicor to unlock the PO (FX_Upd_POHeader_ICPOLocked_False)
We’re having the same issue, any solution?
Tim’s answer is better than mine. Tim’s answer is better than EpiCare’s answer. I wish I had asked Tim instead of Epicare when we ran into this.
We had the same issue. We put a UD field on Part to store a four digit shelf life. Then added a data directive on Part Lot to calculate and set the Expiration date based on our custom shelf life.
You might be able to make this happen with a new “Terms Code” with two “Payment Schedule” rows
also, has there been a receipt?
Yes, you can do that, that is exactly what we do. just turn off Lot control on the Part Maintenance Detail screen and then on the Part Site tab turn on the “back flush” flag. There is lso some set up to make backflush function correctly. there is a Backflush Task that needs to be scheduled and within the BOM structure the parts that you want to backflush have to be tied to an operation that is set to Labor Entry: Backflush. in our case we didn’t have any backflush operations so we had go back in and add a backflush operation in the BOO just for a place to tie backflush materials, the operation had no labor time in it.
He’s right. Don’t do it. After a users first sign in on a particular workstation they can go into Setting>More settings>Preferences and select “automatically sign in” and then they won’t be prompted to enter their password on that machine again.
you either make or purchase those machined castings. I think what you want to do is set the BOM qty per parent to zero. that will make it appear in the BOM but not drive demand or roll up into the cost.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.