Hi Fiona, we have many customers using FIFO, AVG, AVGFIFO.Each of them have there own specific ways of working but the they tend to have much less variances than STD.How often are you revisiting the STD cost and updating, or like most raw materials is it moving too often to make that a viable option?You can test each of the cost methods at a part level to see the differences in your Pilot/Test environment.
Hi, not sure I am seeing your error correctly above on the image, it appears to be missing? If you are reworking, there is a few different ways of doing this. Could you post the error again please?
Good morning, rather than doing a nonconformance as part of end labour you should do this as nc against the job wip material affected. This is automatically unallocate the material so that you can reissue a none defective part. Pick the Non Conformance from the MES Production menu and ensure when relating to a job you pick New Material NC. Hope this helps.
Hi there, I had this exact same thing, in the groups where you don’t want to cycle through fields, set the TabStop option to false in each of them. That achieved the outcome for my customer.
I have worked with Epicor from 9.04 onwards and always remember it being this way.
I would assume this is still one by one unless Epicor have a clever way of doing this, was always a frustration for customers. Bit of a double edged sword as you want the flexibility to do that, until you don’t :)
Hi Steve, I know this isn’t a button and search but if I have understood correctly you just want to flag a user against the PO you expect to receive it. Using a dropdown box like the example below makes this pretty easy to do.Hope this is what you are after.Anyone flagged as inactive doesn’t show in the list. Let me know how you get on.
Hi Steve, I have done similar things using combo boxes and the standard filtering options within those if I remember correctly. What version are you running? Classic, Shell or Kinetic?
Hi Daniel, There are a few options on this, the route I would go down depends if you need to log any actual time or not. You could have none part master record for the service with a job directly attached to collect time/materials, alternatively you could skip the job element. Really depends on your process and what you intend to do with the data.
Should be pretty straight forward then David. Needless to say there may be some values moving around based on costing method, etc. Have fun!
Hi David, A few questions such as are the parts are serial/lot tracked and in multiple locations?Essentially write a BAQ to output a DMT file with the required fields.Then have a calculated field to tell you what required adjustment is needed.Calculation would be something along the lines of -binvalue + 1In a simple format if you had 10 in stock the above would give you a adjustment of -9 taking you back to your required stock figure of 1. Hope that makes sense :)
I’m not aware of a license, I have done a customisation before that has a checkbox on the part and then a BPM to populate the inspection required checkbox on a PO at the point a PO is raised for that part. Hope that helps.
This made me chuckle, we get asked for this all the time. It isn’t there standard I don’t believe. (Although there is a field on the part table called rcvinspectionreq)It is against the Supplier, Part Class and can be manually set on a PO Release in standard.
I would personally use a subquery to evaluate this assuming you want to know the last operation per job. Either a first/last type setup or Max on the operation due date. You could potentially use the final operation checkbox but that would assume the data is being maintained hence why I would go the subquery route.
Hi, We have done a few upgrades for customers moving from Vantage and the same version of Epicor you have mentioned up to 10.2.600 and 10.2.700, so close but not quite the same. The Cirrus upgrade toolset may be something that is worth looking at. It is a cost effective way of upgrading and deals with a lot of the upgrade issues you may encounter that become a time sink.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.